Thursday, May 29, 2008
Cona/McDarby - Split Vioxx Appellate Decision
This goes into the "breaking news" category. The New Jersey Appellate Division has rendered a split decision in the Cona/McDarby Vioxx appeal. A copy of the opinion is here. Bexis is involved in the case and thus conflicted out from saying anything substantive. Herrmann hasn't read it yet. In a nutshell, compensatory liabilty for failure to warn was affirmed against defense arguments based upon preemption, the NJ statutory presumption stemming from FDA approval, causation, and a variety of evidentiary and jury instruction points. Punitive damages were overturned based upon Buckman preemption. Damages - and, more importantly millions of dollars in attorneys fees, under the NJ Consumer Fraud Act - were overturned because the CFA was subsumed by the New Jersey Product Liability Act in product liability cases.
Labels:
Consumer Fraud,
Implied Preemption,
New Jersey,
Punitive Damages,
Vioxx
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Re: the role of preemption, I would strong recommend pp. 58 and following of the decision.
Good post!
What happened the last few months?
Erwin
Vioxx articles
My name is Tina Harris and i would like to show you my personal experience with Vioxx.
I am 40 years old. Have been on Vioxx for 6 months now. I had quit taking Vioxx long before the recall because it was the only new med introduced into my regimen at the time the symptoms started. I was told that if I continued to take it, I would be let go from my job because of inability to perform simple tasks.
I have experienced some of these side effects -
vertigo, diarrhea, abdominal pain, respiratory problems and memory loss. I still have memory loss and have gaps in my thinking process where I can't even think of common words I am trying to say, even to this day.
I hope this information will be useful to others,
Tina Harris
Post a Comment